Referee Comments and Responses

This section describes this paper's path through review. We share the substantive parts of editors' reports (with permission), and explain how they shaped our changes to the paper. We tried to use AI to extract and share the substantive content of the referee reports, but the language models would not cooperate.

What we submitted (Jun 12, 2024) Manuscript ↗

This was a short descriptive paper, much like the final article.

Editor's comments (Jun 21, 2024)

[...] Because your manuscript was not given a sufficiently high priority rating during the initial screening process, we have decided not to proceed to in-depth review.

[...]

The editors think your paper could be a good candidate for our high-level, interdisciplinary, open access journal, Science Advances.

How we changed the paper

No feedback was given. We sent the paper to the next journal.